The Father’s Balm: A Legacy of Empathy
The room was bathed in the soft glow of a dying Italian summer, a poignant backdrop to the quiet devastation etched on Elio’s face. His world, once a vibrant tapestry of newfound love and exhilarating discovery, now lay in shattered fragments, the abrupt departure of Oliver leaving a gaping wound in his young heart. It was in this moment of raw vulnerability that his father, a figure of quiet strength and profound empathy, stepped forward, offering not platitudes or easy answers, but a balm of understanding born from a life fully lived.

His father’s words, as the video transcript reveals, were not those of a typical parent. He acknowledged Elio’s pain, the all-consuming nature of his grief, but instead of offering hollow reassurances, he validated it. “You may not want to feel anything now,” he began, his voice a gentle current in the storm of Elio’s emotions, “but don’t.” He recognized the “beautiful friendship,” the intense connection Elio had shared with Oliver, and instead of wishing it away, he expressed a wistful envy. “Most parents would hope this goes away,” he confessed, “but I am not that parent.”
This was not a dismissal of Elio’s pain but an invitation to embrace it. The father understood that grief, like joy, was a testament to the depth of feeling, a measure of the love that had been. To suppress it, to pretend it didn’t exist, would be a “waste,” a betrayal of the profound experience Elio had been privileged to have. He spoke from a place of experience, a quiet acknowledgment that he had never known such a connection, a longing that perhaps colored his own life.

The father’s monologue was a meditation on the fleeting nature of time, the ephemeral beauty of youth and physical attraction. He didn’t shy away from the harsh realities, the inevitable fading of passion, the eventual parting of ways. But instead of offering this as a source of despair, he framed it as a reason to cherish every moment, to fully inhabit the present, even in its pain. “We rip out so much of ourselves to be cured of things faster that we go bankrupt by thirty,” he warned, urging Elio to resist the temptation to numb himself, to avoid the messy, uncomfortable truth of his emotions.

His advice was not to “kill” the sorrow, but to live with it, to allow it to coexist with the joy that had preceded it. He understood that grief and love were two sides of the same coin, inextricably linked. To reject one was to diminish the other. He encouraged Elio to embrace the full spectrum of his experience, to find solace not in forgetting, but in remembering, in honoring the intensity of his feelings, both past and present.
In the end, the father’s monologue was a testament to the enduring power of empathy, a legacy passed down from one generation to the next. It was a reminder that even in the face of profound loss, there is beauty, there is meaning, and there is a profound comfort in being seen, in being understood, and in being loved, even in our pain.